I guess I just wasn’t paying attention. Only recently I learned that some real people
think the American embassy move to Jerusalem is a bad idea. I don’t mean the anti-Semites, or sufferers
of Trump Derangement Psychosis, or Left-wing pundits, I mean normal people. Even an Israeli friend thinks the move is a
needless provocation that endangers her family.
I think it is important to understand why these sincere and decent
people are wrong and President Trump is right.
First of all, the Muslims cannot be provoked. Their mission is to destroy Israel, they will
kill as many Jews as necessary to do it, and they have been undeterred since
1947. So, the comment about
unnecessarily provoking the Muslims is especially disturbing coming from an
Israeli because Israelis cannot afford to misjudge their enemy.
Nonsense aside (and there is just so much of it whenever the
subject is Israel), the one great danger to my friend and her family is the
never-ending war between Israel and her Arab neighbors. Today, Israel is secure because she is strong
and her enemies are divided and weak, but what will be ten years from now? A hundred years from now? There are more than 400 million Arabs
surrounding Israel, and the day they get their shit together will be Israel’s
last day on earth. Time is not on her
side and Israel needs to make peace now, while she can do it from a position of
strength. But, how to do that?
All wars end in only one of two ways. Either one side is comprehensively defeated,
or they both realize victory is impossible and continued hostilities are
pointless, and too expensive in blood and treasure. There is nothing else.
The great modern example of the first case is World War II,
which ended only when the Germans were pulverized, and the Japanese were
incinerated, into submission.
The great modern example of the second case is the U.S. in
Vietnam. The Americans won every battle,
including the notorious and much misunderstood Tet Offensive of 1968, which was
a military disaster for the North Vietnamese.
And yet, although devastated, the North Vietnamese clearly and
convincingly signaled their intent to continue the war. The Americans concluded that victory, if it
could ever be achieved, would come at a price they were not willing to pay, so
they packed up their entrenching tools and went home.
I should mention that the North Vietnamese were able to
continue the war because they got enormous political support world-wide and
enormous material support from China and the USSR. So, the war was not just the U.S. against N.
Vietnam, it was the U.S. against N. Vietnam and half the world.
Even in the Middle East, Egypt treated for peace with Israel
only after the “Yom Kippur War”.
Although Egypt could execute a complete tactical surprise and battlefield advances at the beginning, in days their 3rd Army was
surrounded and nearly annihilated in the Sinai Desert. And, due to some astonishing “out-of-the-box”
thinking by Ariel Sharon, elements of the Israeli Army crossed the Suez Canal,
out-flanked Egyptian forces, and stopped a mere 100 km (60 mi) from a defenseless
Cairo. Explaining the stop, one Israeli
soldier quipped, “What would we do with Cairo?” but Anwar el-Sadat understood the threat.
Israeli arms
convinced Sadat he could not win on the battlefield. Shortly thereafter, Sadat signed the first of
two agreements with Israel and, in 1977, made his historic visit to Jerusalem
for a peace treaty with Israel.
In all of human history, here is what never happened. It has never happened that one belligerent
says to the other, “Stop being a dick”.
Whereupon the other side slaps their forehead in realization and says,
“You know what? You’re right.” And then they kiss and make up and live
happily ever after. So, if your strategy
for peace depends upon one side or the other being persuaded by a
smooth-talking Obama-like figure, don’t bet the safety and security of your
children on it.
Which brings us to Arab-Israeli wars. The Arabs lose every battle but continue the war. Why do they do it? How is that even possible?
The Arabs are neither stupid nor crazy. They continue to fight because they think
they can win, and they are reasonable in that expectation. Like the N. Vietnamese before them, the Arabs
get enormous political support world-wide, and they get enormous material
support from Muslim countries, even some European ones. They see Israel’s hand being
restrained, even by America, putatively her closest ally. They, too, can read a map (Israel is a speck in an ocean of Arabs), and their memories
are long. The Arabs remember it took
them 200 years to expel the Crusaders, and they are willing to spend another
200 years, if that is what it takes, to expel the Jews.
The Arabs will never stop.
Unless they are convinced that victory is impossible, and they are made
to endure too much pain at too high a cost.
I’m sorry, but there is no other way.
To the Arabs, the American embassy move to Jerusalem is a clear signal the political climate is changing against them. Of course, the move counts for little, by
itself, but it is not nothing. And, if
it is the first of many signals that they are losing support, and that Israel
is gaining it, the Arabs will make peace with Israel.
How can I be so sure? Think of it this way: we know how wars have ended, in all other places in all other times. For 70 years, we have tried a different strategy to end the Arab-Israeli war, and this strategy has failed, utterly. I think we should use the one strategy that has the highest chance for success: the Arabs must be convinced victory is impossible.
The American embassy
move sends exactly the right signal.
No comments:
Post a Comment