I think I understand the Russian Collusion hysteria on the political Left. It lies in bone-deep incredulity, and we have seen this sort of thing before.
In the "Six Day War" between Israel and her Arab neighbors, the Arabs became convinced that Americans were directly involved in the fighting, especially the American air force. And they were convinced of this, not out of delusion, but for specific, technical, perfectly understandable, and wrong, reasons.
The Arabs knew exactly what planes the Israelis were flying and how many. Every plane needs some number of hours of maintenance on the ground for every hour of flight. E.g. (I am making up the numbers), a plane might need 6 hours on the ground for every hour in the air. These numbers are widely known for each type of plane and you can calculate the theoretical maximum number of sorties an air force can operate in one 24-hr period. This is an essential calculation for every staff officer drawing up operational plans, whether you are flying the sorties or defending against them.
Based on perfectly good Arab calculations, the Israelis were flying way more sorties than was theoretically possible. There had to be more planes than the Israelis possessed, and they could have come only from the U.S.
There was nothing wrong with the logic, but the Arabs were not aware of Israeli capacity for innovation. At the time, the Arabs could not know that the Israelis made modifications to their combat aircraft and, with excellent training of their ground crews, the Israelis were able to dramatically reduce ground time. All else equal, if you can halve the ground time you can double the sorties. It's a big deal.
No doubt, most of the Arab military officers now understand this. But, for most people, ignorant of the technical issues, American complicity is easier to understand. And it is a far more comforting narrative than the superior technical abilities of a contemptible enemy. The myth of American complicity is very much alive and well in the Arab world. Indeed, it has only grown in the telling.
I think something very like this happened in 2016. The Trump team had a superior campaign strategy, not well understood by the Democratic Party at the time. Combined with an especially bad Democratic candidate, Trump pulled off a victory the Democrats were sure was impossible. In military parlance, besides an innovative strategy, Trump was "lucky in his enemies".
But, if you are the Democratic Party and Trump is the contemptible enemy, outside help is a far more comforting narrative, and it grows in the telling. Many people on the Left sincerely believe the Mueller investigation will discover what they "know" has to be true, and they will take that belief to the grave, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
No comments:
Post a Comment